Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: BUG #2945: possibly forgotten SPI_push()/SPI_pop()
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Sergiy Vyshnevetskiy <serg(at)vostok(dot)net>
- Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: BUG #2945: possibly forgotten SPI_push()/SPI_pop()
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:20:22 -0500
Sergiy Vyshnevetskiy <serg(at)vostok(dot)net> writes: > This hack makes SPI_pusn()/SPI_pop() wrapper optional. We are *certainly* not fixing it like that. regards, tom lane
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: BUG #2945: possibly forgotten SPI_push()/SPI_pop()
- From: Sergiy Vyshnevetskiy
- Re: BUG #2945: possibly forgotten SPI_push()/SPI_pop()
- References:
- BUG #2945: possibly forgotten SPI_push()/SPI_pop()
- From: Sergiy Vyshnevetskiy
- Re: BUG #2945: possibly forgotten SPI_push()/SPI_pop()
- From: Sergiy Vyshnevetskiy
- BUG #2945: possibly forgotten SPI_push()/SPI_pop()
- Prev by Date: Re: now() in PL/pgSQL Functions
- Next by Date: Re: BUG #2945: possibly forgotten SPI_push()/SPI_pop()
- Previous by thread: Re: BUG #2945: possibly forgotten SPI_push()/SPI_pop()
- Next by thread: Re: BUG #2945: possibly forgotten SPI_push()/SPI_pop()
- Indexes: