Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: Theo Schlossnagle <jesus(at)omniti(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, josh(dot)berkus(at)sun(dot)com, robert(dot)lor(at)sun(dot)com
- Subject: Re: BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64
- Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 10:38:36 -0400
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes: > OK, this is a great help. If you think it should be just one file we > can do that, but since the are separate instructions sets, separate > files I think still makes sense. There is no reason for the i386 or AMD64 code to be different from what's already tested on Linux --- the hardware's the same and the OS surely doesn't make a difference at this level. Does Solaris' assembler really support C-style "#if defined()" constructs in .s files? That seems moderately unlikely. regards, tom lane
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64
- From: Theo Schlossnagle
- Re: BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64
- References:
- Re: BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64
- From: Bruce Momjian
- Re: BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64
- Prev by Date: Re: BUG #2400: 'Ã' considered invalid UTF-8 character
- Next by Date: Re: BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64
- Previous by thread: Re: BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64
- Next by thread: Re: BUG #2401: spinlocks not available on amd64
- Indexes: