Re: SELECT FOR UPDATE and LIMIT 1 behave oddly
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
- Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: SELECT FOR UPDATE and LIMIT 1 behave oddly
- Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 00:02:32 -0400
- Message-id: <25217.1097726552@sss.pgh.pa.us> <text/plain>
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> Summary: SELECT FOR UPDATE and LIMIT behave oddly when combined
The FOR UPDATE part executes after the LIMIT part. Arguably this is a
bad thing, but I'm concerned about the compatibility issues if we change
it.
regards, tom lane
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index