Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
- From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: Michael Dean <mdean(at)sourceview(dot)com>, Randolf Richardson <rr(at)8x(dot)ca>, pgsql-benchmarks(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
- Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:03:43 -0500
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes: > Michael Dean wrote: >> Also keep in mind that CA released Ingre (forerunner to Postgre), IBM >> released the improved code from Informix, and Borland firebird. So > What source code has IBM released? Cloudscape, a pure-Java SQL database (though I'm not sure that that's what Michael meant). regards, tom lane
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
- From: Randolf Richardson
- Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
- References:
- Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
- From: Bruce Momjian
- Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
- Prev by Date: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
- Next by Date: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
- Previous by thread: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
- Next by thread: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
- Indexes: