Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
PostgreSQL name
- From: "Guido Barosio" <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com>
- To: "PostgreSQL Advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: PostgreSQL name
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 02:29:08 -0300
- Message-id: <f7f6b4c70805192229m7b78ff9ek2d424c2ad19a680(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
I was trying to find a thread where the discussion relied on the name, using PostgreSQL or just Postgres. AFAIK there was an agreement and PostgreSQL *won* that discussion, but I am unable to find that thread and I may be wrong. This comes to me because I was trying to push some *advocacy* stuff to the -es mailing list, and now I am not sure on how to proceeed. The case is that the .org FAQ explains that both names are just fine, and I am happy with that, but I seem to recall that PostgreSQL was the preferred option. Though, if this is the case we should change that from the site, right? -- Guido Barosio ----------------------- http://www.globant.com guido(dot)barosio(at)globant(dot)com
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: PostgreSQL name
- From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira
- Re: PostgreSQL name
- From: Robert Treat
- Re: PostgreSQL name
- From: Guido Barosio
- Re: PostgreSQL name
- Prev by Date: Re: Need for PostgreSQL demand?
- Next by Date: Re: PostgreSQL name
- Previous by thread: Re: Need for PostgreSQL demand?
- Next by thread: Re: PostgreSQL name
- Indexes: