Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: bad advocacy by TWiki bigwig
- From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- To: Ned Lilly <ned(at)nedscape(dot)com>
- Cc: Dirk Riehle <dirk(at)riehle(dot)org>, Koen Martens <pgsql(at)metro(dot)cx>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Thoeny <peter(at)thoeny(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: bad advocacy by TWiki bigwig
- Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2008 08:14:18 -0800
- Message-id: <47B85D5A(dot)2000808(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Ned Lilly wrote:
Thanks for posting this, Dirk (and Peter). I don't think any of us would disagree that different models yield different results, and that the Postgres community model is more focused on developing a great product than (necessarily) a single great company. However, I'm curious about Rod's market share comment - is that documented in any meaningful way?
It's great that they posted it, but they obviously don't understand PostgreSQL. It's doesn't have a business model :P, it isn't supposed to.
Joshua D. Drake
- References:
- bad advocacy by TWiki bigwig
- From: Koen Martens
- Re: bad advocacy by TWiki bigwig
- From: Dirk Riehle
- Re: bad advocacy by TWiki bigwig
- From: Ned Lilly
- bad advocacy by TWiki bigwig
- Prev by Date: Re: bad advocacy by TWiki bigwig
- Next by Date: Re: bad advocacy by TWiki bigwig
- Previous by thread: Re: bad advocacy by TWiki bigwig
- Next by thread: 10 reasons to entrust your data to PostgreSQL
- Indexes: