Re: A FAQ that needs updating?

[Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>]

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> > I would like to know myself.  I assume Josh Berkus but am just
> > guessing. Can we just remove the last three items on that page?
> 
> O.k. just so I am 100% clear :) We are talking about the /press/faq
> right? If so... IMO the following needs to happen:
> 
> The press FAQ should be a section (internal ref of course) within the
> general FAQ as I am guessing there is some significant overlap.
> 
> I believe that press should be replaced with the word Advocacy or maybe
> Advocacy & Press.
> 
> All redundant information should be removed between the general and
> press advocacy sections.
> 
> Add a section on the FAQ page for the Advocacy & Press section that
> links to the section within the general FAQ.
> 
> Appropriate rewrites put in place to push all requests for the old FAQ
> to the new (and proper) one.

I wasn't going to go that far at this point.  I was just suggesting
removing the bottom three items that are related to the 8.3 release.

-- 
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://postgres.enterprisedb.com

  + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +