Re: [DOCS] Pattern for use of the alias "Postgres"

["Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>]

On Thu, 25 Oct 2007 16:10:31 -0400 (EDT)
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:


> > > Just undo the whole thing.  The project name is what it is. 
> > 
> > +1.
> 
> Let's not get sidetracked here.  There was already agreement in
> advocacy to promote the use of the alias, and this thread is to
> discuss that, not to revisit whether we should use an alias or not.
> If you want to bring up that issue, start a thread and try to get
> agreement on it.
> 

Woah, let's be very clear here. There was zero agreement to promote the
name postgres. There was agreement to state that Postgres was an
acceptable form of the word PostgreSQL.

Which I do still agree with, but that is far from "promoting". 

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake


-- 

      === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997  http://www.commandprompt.com/
			UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature