Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.

[Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>]

On 9/28/2007 11:56 AM, Robert Treat wrote:
> On Friday 28 September 2007 11:28, David Fetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:13:47AM -0400, Brian Hurt wrote:
> > > Josh Berkus wrote:
> > > >JD,
> > > >
> > > >>Why don't we just stop this whole PostgreSQL->Postgres->Postgre
> > > >>junk and just say, PostgreSQL, also referred to as PG.
> > > >
> > > >I think PG is trademarked by the Motion Picture Association of
> > > >America.  And you *know* you don't want to tangle with their
> > > >attorneys.
> > > >
> > > >;-)
> > > >
> > > >I vote for "UltimateDB".
> > >
> > > Given the length of this thread, I vote for "Digres".
> >
> > +1 ;)
>
> Sorry, I have to disagree. I don't think it is clear what the Digres project 
> would be.  Now if you went with DigreSQL, then I'm on board. 

And it takes how long until we see "Digre"? I think we cannot use 
anything that ends with an s.

What about Postgrep? It says something about searching for rows even 
without DB or SQL, and for people coming from the most popular open 
source database, SQL is a necessary inconvenience to search over flat 
files in a concurrent environment anyway.


Jan

--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #