Re: name Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
- To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, John Wang <johncwang(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy List <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: name Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 19:03:12 -0400
- Message-id: <46FED9B0.70809@Yahoo.com> <text/plain>
On 9/27/2007 2:13 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Joshua D. Drake escribió:
Interesting point but I don't think that would be a problem in general.
Mainly because as good as we are... we are not Proctor & Gamble ;). Nor
are we even in the same sector (business/financial etc...).
I like Pg but I would also not be opposed to pgsql, which is extremely
common.
I think we're trying to find a name for saying out aloud. Both "pg" and
"pgsql" are mostly used in writing.
blah blah ... PostgreSQL (pronounced Postgres-Q-L), also known as pgsql
(pronounced Pigsqueal) ...
Jan (pronounced Yann) occasionally referred to as a European bloke
(pronounce that with *ouch* at the end to spare me the effort)
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index