Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- From: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
- Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
- Subject: Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 09:55:03 -0700
Robert Treat wrote:
On Friday 28 September 2007 13:18, Andrew Sullivan wrote:On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 10:13:47AM -0400, Brian Hurt wrote:Given the length of this thread, I vote for "Digres".Except then it'll regularly get misspelled as Digress. And pronounced Dee'-gray. I think we should call it Gerwuffle. Like, "Yeah, go install that Gerwuffle over there, and twiddle the thingy, and you'll be set to go." Or, of course, we can do what certain other parties with previous renaming problems did. We can be The Database Formerly Known as Postgres. Then when someone complains about confusion with the PostQUEL-using version of the code, we can just become The Database. That oughta clear up any confusion, eh?Then CMD could be "The" The Database Company.
Sold! Joshua D. Drake
- References:
- Dropping postgres as a whole.
- From: Joshua D. Drake
- Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- From: Brian Hurt
- Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- From: Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- From: Robert Treat
- Dropping postgres as a whole.
- Prev by Date: Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- Next by Date: Re: Using Postgres as an alias
- Previous by thread: Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- Next by thread: Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- Indexes: