Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Cafeconf 2007
- From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
- To: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
- Cc: Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy List <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Cafeconf 2007
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 18:53:15 +0100
- Message-id: <1191001995.4174.25.camel@ebony.site> <text/plain>
On Fri, 2007-09-28 at 13:10 -0400, Greg Smith wrote: > -The MySQL InnoDB implementation is mathematically serializable, where as > the Postgres one isn't, so in that particular case they actually implement > more strict transaction semantics. Some evidence of what you say would go down nicely. -- Simon Riggs 2ndQuadrant http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
- References:
- Cafeconf 2007
- From: Guido Barosio
- Re: Cafeconf 2007
- From: Guido Barosio
- Re: Cafeconf 2007
- From: Josh Berkus
- Re: Cafeconf 2007
- From: Greg Smith
- Cafeconf 2007
- Prev by Date: Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- Next by Date: COSSFEST event in Calgary
- Previous by thread: Re: Cafeconf 2007
- Next by thread: name or alias
- Indexes: