Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Cafeconf 2007
- From: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>
- Cc: Guido Barosio <gbarosio(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy List <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Cafeconf 2007
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:10:40 -0400 (EDT)
- Message-id: <Pine.GSO.4.64.0709281301180.4636@westnet.com> <text/plain>
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Josh Berkus wrote:
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs.83 http://www.postgresql.org/docs/techdocs.84
Quick update on these...I've been informed of two issues I'm told are incorrect in there:
-I suggest ALTER TABLE need a more aggressive lock on MySQL than Postgres, which isn't true.
-The MySQL InnoDB implementation is mathematically serializable, where as the Postgres one isn't, so in that particular case they actually implement more strict transaction semantics.
I'll be fixing the text when I get time to address these fully, just didn't want anyone else to propagate these mistakes before I get to it.
-- * Greg Smith gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cafeconf 2007
- From: Simon Riggs
- Re: Cafeconf 2007
- References:
- Cafeconf 2007
- From: Guido Barosio
- Re: Cafeconf 2007
- From: Guido Barosio
- Re: Cafeconf 2007
- From: Josh Berkus
- Cafeconf 2007
- Prev by Date: Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- Next by Date: Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- Previous by thread: Re: Cafeconf 2007
- Next by thread: Re: Cafeconf 2007
- Indexes: