Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- From: "Gavin M. Roy" <gmr(at)myyearbook(dot)com>
- To: "Brian Hurt" <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com>
- Cc: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL Advocacy List" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:32:56 -0400
- Message-id: <af1bce590709280732v80fba20q5c3476e75cc31e45@mail.gmail.com> <text/plain>
LOL thank you for a good laugh.
On 9/28/07, Brian Hurt <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>
> > JD,
> >
> >> Why don't we just stop this whole PostgreSQL->Postgres->Postgre junk
> and
> >> just say, PostgreSQL, also referred to as PG.
> >
> >
> > I think PG is trademarked by the Motion Picture Association of
> > America. And you *know* you don't want to tangle with their attorneys.
> >
> > ;-)
> >
> > I vote for "UltimateDB".
> >
>
> Given the length of this thread, I vote for "Digres".
>
> Brian
>
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index