Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- From: Brian Hurt <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com>
- To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
- Cc: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy List <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:13:47 -0400
- Message-id: <46FD0C1B.6050804@janestcapital.com> <text/plain>
Josh Berkus wrote:
JD,Why don't we just stop this whole PostgreSQL->Postgres->Postgre junk and just say, PostgreSQL, also referred to as PG.I think PG is trademarked by the Motion Picture Association of America. And you *know* you don't want to tangle with their attorneys.;-) I vote for "UltimateDB".
Given the length of this thread, I vote for "Digres". Brian
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- From: Andrew Sullivan
- Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- From: David Fetter
- Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- From: Gavin M. Roy
- Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- References:
- Dropping postgres as a whole.
- From: Joshua D. Drake
- Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- From: Josh Berkus
- Dropping postgres as a whole.
- Prev by Date: Re: Cafeconf 2007
- Next by Date: Re: name Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- Previous by thread: Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- Next by thread: Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- Indexes: