Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- From: Selena Deckelmann <sdeckelmann(at)chrisking(dot)com>
- To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Advocacy List <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:11:34 -0700
- Message-id: <D88EC1E3-7379-49C1-9338-25AA6A925B20@chrisking.com> <text/plain>
On Sep 27, 2007, at 9:39 AM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Hello, I was just talking with one of my developers (Alexey) and he said, whynot just use Pg. Which is an interesting point. Consider that Volkswagenis properly known as Volkswagen but commonly (and most of the time) referred to as VW.Why don't we just stop this whole PostgreSQL->Postgres->Postgre junk andjust say, PostgreSQL, also referred to as PG.Heck, I know plenty of people that just say PG, or PGSQL, myself included.
+1 I like it.From a design standpoint, 'Pg' is nicer. I know we're not there yet, but just sayin'.
-selena -- Selena Deckelmann Information Systems Manager Chris King Precision Components Made in Portland, Oregon www.chrisking.com / 503.972.4050 x230
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- From: Marc G. Fournier
- Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- References:
- Dropping postgres as a whole.
- From: Joshua D. Drake
- Dropping postgres as a whole.
- Prev by Date: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- Next by Date: Re: Using Postgres as an alias
- Previous by thread: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- Next by thread: Re: Dropping postgres as a whole.
- Indexes: