| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: L |
| Date: | 2007-08-14 14:31:30 |
| Message-ID: | 200708140731.30653.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
All,
> Actually very few RDBMS support transactional DDL, though right this
> second I do not remember what they do in case you issue DDL inside a
> transaction. I would assume/hope that they give you an error and not do
> an implicit commit.
Speaking of which, we should make a big point of our transactional DDL as a
feature. It's something that even some of the big proprietary DBs don't
have.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonah H. Harris | 2007-08-14 16:43:16 | Re: PostgreSQL vs. MySQL: fight |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-08-14 14:19:03 | Re: default_text_search_config and expression indexes |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-08-14 15:04:45 | Developer Section of main web site --- Coding |
| Previous Message | Tino Wildenhain | 2007-08-14 09:36:25 | Re: Features list |