Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0?
- From: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
- To: "Robert Treat" <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
- Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com, usleepless(at)gmail(dot)com, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0?
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 07:32:08 +0200
> > That would be just because you don't know the numbering scheme. 8.2 to > > 8.3 is considered "major" in these parts. See > > http://www.postgresql.org/support/versioning > > Is that official policy? I don't see any mention of it in the docs. Are you somehow suggesting that our website isn't official? Where did you get that idea? As for inclusion in the docs I beleive we're still waiting for your patch... /Magnus
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0?
- From: Robert Treat
- Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0?
- References:
- Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0?
- From: Robert Treat
- Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0?
- Prev by Date: Re: cost per transaction
- Next by Date: Re: cost per transaction
- Previous by thread: Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0?
- Next by thread: Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0?
- Indexes: