Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0?
- From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
- To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0?
- Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 15:17:47 -0700
Tom, > Eyeing the patch queue and wondering how much of it is really going to > get in, I'm not sure that eight point two and a half wouldn't be a more > appropriate name. It's been a short devel cycle and one almost entirely > focused on performance, not user-visible features. Ah, in my enthusiasm I was assuming most of it would clear. > > > Seems like it'd be both an annoucement of how far we've come, as well as > > a warning to users that the 8.2-->9.0 upgrade could be painful. > > Why would you think that? File format changes and the implicit conversion patch. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL @ Sun San Francisco
- References:
- Wild idea: 9.0?
- From: Josh Berkus
- Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0?
- From: Tom Lane
- Wild idea: 9.0?
- Prev by Date: Re: Wild idea: 9.0?
- Next by Date: Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0?
- Previous by thread: Re: [HACKERS] Wild idea: 9.0?
- Next by thread: Re: Wild idea: 9.0?
- Indexes: