Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0
- From: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
- To: Brian Hurt <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com>
- Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0
- Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 14:53:40 -0500
On 1/19/2007 12:32 PM, Brian Hurt wrote:
Good comparison (for Postgres, anyways) from digg: http://blog.page2rss.com/2007/01/postgresql-vs-mysql-performance.html
I liked particularly this user comment:"Now, the MySQL performance using the new techniques beats Postgres performance using the old techniques."
So optimizing a crappy database for MySQL makes it faster than running the crappy database on Postgres ... I never expected that one.
Jan
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
match
-- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com #
- References:
- Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0
- From: Brian Hurt
- Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0
- Prev by Date: Re: Linuxworld Toronto, April 30 - May 2
- Next by Date: Oracle to launch Unbrakable MySQL?
- Previous by thread: Re: Postgres v MySQL 5.0
- Next by thread: Linuxworld Toronto, April 30 - May 2
- Indexes: