Re: Collateral for LISA 06

["Roderick A. Anderson" <raanders(at)acm(dot)org>]

As of 9:00 AM Pacific today the lisa_06.pdf looked pretty fuzzy in 
acroread ( Linux ) and was set for fast web viewing.  The lines on the 
building had a good case of the jaggies.

The p2_lisa.pdf looks very good.

8.2_copious.pdf looks pretty good.  What weight of paper is planned for 
the printed version?  This so I can put some samples of what we do 
together for review/evaluation.  Since it is mostly black and white it 
would be tough to show off what we do.  But if we can get company logos 
for the 'Dev' page it would really look nice.


Rod
--
nhrcommu(at)rochester(dot)rr(dot)com wrote:
> duh, sb pgfoundry
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Mike Ellsworth <nhrcommu(at)rochester(dot)rr(dot)com>
> Date: Thursday, November 30, 2006 10:18 am
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Collateral for LISA 06
> To: josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com
> Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Darcy Buskermolen
> <darcyb(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,
> "Roderick A. Anderson" <raanders(at)acm(dot)org>
>
> > I have uploaded "LISA_copious_final.pdf" to PG forge, under General 
> > Press Docs.
> >
> > I had originally planned on including Sponsors' logo, but aside 
> > from the 
> > difficulty of sizing, a brain cell fired and reminded me that 
> > Marketing 
> > departments would flip if they saw the results as they have much 
> > heavier 
> > requirements for print than for the web.
> >
> > The following files should be deleted from pgforge as I think I no 
> > can do:
> >
> > -- team.pdf
> > -- p2_lisa,pdf
> > -- 8.2_copious.pdf
> >
> > The final,  "good" files are:
> > LISA_copious_final.pdf
> > lisa_06.pdf
> >
> > Relevant source files (Photoshop & Illustrator) will be uploaded 
> > during 
> > the day.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mike Ellsworth
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)-----------------------
> > ----
> > TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
> >       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
> >       match