Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper'
- From: Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
- To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
- Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Kaare Rasmussen <kaare(at)jasonic(dot)dk>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper'
- Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 15:28:10 +0100
Hi, Simon Riggs wrote:
Mammoth Replicator is not synchronous anyway ...That's a shame. I thought we might be able get a head start in that way.
Huh? Why should that be a shame? Do you have anything better to propose? Maybe you can get away with Sequoia? Or support my efforts with Postgres-R? Regards Markus
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper'
- From: Simon Riggs
- Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper'
- References:
- Re: Open source databases '60 per cent
- From: Bruce Momjian
- Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper'
- From: Joshua D. Drake
- Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper'
- From: Simon Riggs
- Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper'
- From: Alvaro Herrera
- Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper'
- From: Simon Riggs
- Re: Open source databases '60 per cent
- Prev by Date: Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper'
- Next by Date: Re: Collateral for LISA 06
- Previous by thread: Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper'
- Next by thread: Re: Open source databases '60 per cent cheaper'
- Indexes: