Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Time to scale up?
- From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- Cc: Thomas Hallgren <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Paul Ramsey <pramsey(at)refractions(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Pgsql-Advocacy(at)Postgresql(dot)Org" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Time to scale up?
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:34:25 -0400
- Message-id: <20060726143425(dot)GC5187(at)surnet(dot)cl>
Joshua D. Drake wrote: > Thomas Hallgren wrote: > >Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> > >>Which version of Replication do we throw in here? > >> > >IMHO, the current players should be encouraged create a joint portfolio > >that makes sense. > > All due respect but that is a pipe dream. Why? The current players list reduces to 1. Slony-I So it's not that difficult to get them to agree with themselves. The other possible players are all excused: - DBmirror: the author considers it obsolete - Postgres-R: it's still under development - erServer: obsolete, abandoned, inferior to Slony-I anyway - Mammoth Replicator: proprietary Am I missing anyone? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
- References:
- Time to scale up?
- From: Thomas Hallgren
- Re: Time to scale up?
- From: Josh Berkus
- Re: Time to scale up?
- From: Paul Ramsey
- Re: Time to scale up?
- From: Marc G. Fournier
- Re: Time to scale up?
- From: Thomas Hallgren
- Re: Time to scale up?
- From: Joshua D. Drake
- Time to scale up?
- Prev by Date: Re: Time to scale up?
- Next by Date: Re: Time to scale up?
- Previous by thread: Re: Time to scale up?
- Next by thread: Re: Time to scale up?
- Indexes: