Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions
- From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
- To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
- Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 14:41:22 -0800
- Message-id: <200403311441.22936.josh@agliodbs.com> <text/plain>
Tom, > This looks more like an underling with a checklist than a serious > inquiry. Can you get them to specify particular capabilities that they > need? In sufficient detail that we could actually answer? Ok, talked with him. They are trying to plan OO-->DB mapping in 3 programming languages for a large project. Large enough that they would cost out implementing these SQL99 features for us if they like PostgreSQL otherwise. But they *do* need to complete the checklist for each candidate database system. So ... can anyone more familiar with SQL99 than me give some feedback? -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
- References:
- SQL Spec Compliance Questions
- From: Josh Berkus
- Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions
- From: Tom Lane
- SQL Spec Compliance Questions
- Prev by Date: Aberdeen Study on OS RDBMS: exceprts and breakdown.
- Next by Date: Advocacy initiative PHP5/PostgreSQL
- Previous by thread: Re: [SQL] SQL Spec Compliance Questions
- Next by thread: Aberdeen Study on OS RDBMS: exceprts and breakdown.
- Indexes: