• Text Size: Normal / Large
• Donate
• Contact

Section Navigation

• Community
• Contributors
• Mailing Lists
  • Subscribe
  • User lists
    • pgsql-admin
    • pgsql-advocacy
    • pgsql-announce
    • pgsql-bugs
    • pgsql-docs
    • pgsql-general
    • pgsql-jobs
    • pgsql-novice
    • pgsql-performance
    • pgsql-php
    • pgsql-sql
    • pgsql-students
  • Developer lists
  • Regional lists
  • Associations
  • User groups
  • Project lists
  • Inactive lists
• IRC
• Featured Users
• International Sites
• Propaganda
• Resources
• Weekly News
• Community login
  • Profile
  • Lost password

pgsql-advocacy 2004-02 Chronological Index (1/2)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]

• 29 February 2004
  • Re: [pgsql-www] Why not fork PHP.NET V i s h a l Kashyap @ [Sai Hertz And Control Systems] (16:34)
• 28 February 2004
  • Re: Question Bruce Momjian (22:49)
• 27 February 2004
  • Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance Dan Langille (17:10)
  • Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance Josh Berkus (17:09)
  • Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance Dan Langille (12:35)
  • Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance Troels Arvin (08:53)
  • Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance Josh Berkus (06:13)
  • Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance Christopher Browne (04:20)
  • Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance Gavin Sherry (02:45)
  • Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance Neil Conway (02:13)
  • Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance Josh Berkus (01:51)
• 26 February 2004
  • Re: [pgsql-www] Why not fork PHP.NET David Costa (22:57)
  • Why not fork PHP.NET Jean-Michel POURE (22:11)
  • Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance Troels Arvin (21:58)
  • Re: features required for SQL 92 conformance Josh Berkus (20:33)
  • features required for SQL 92 conformance uma chingunde (11:07)
• 25 February 2004
  • Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media V i s h a l Kashyap @ [Sai Hertz And Control Systems] (20:57)
  • Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media Robert Treat (19:20)
  • Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media David Costa (19:11)
  • Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media Marc G. Fournier (18:52)
  • Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media elein (18:51)
  • Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media Marc G. Fournier (18:50)
  • Re: OSDB.org Josh Berkus (18:40)
  • Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media Robert Treat (18:37)
  • Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media David Costa (18:23)
  • Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media Dan Langille (18:10)
  • Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media elein (18:08)
  • Re: OSDB.org scott.marlowe (17:54)
  • features required for SQL 92 conformance Uma Chingunde (13:02)
  • Re: OSDB.org Christopher Browne (06:19)
  • OSDB.org Christopher Kings-Lynne (02:11)
  • Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media Marc G. Fournier (00:51)
• 24 February 2004
  • Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media Dan Langille (23:10)
  • Re: Another Postgresql mention in the media Gavin Sherry (23:00)
  • Another Postgresql mention in the media Darcy Buskermolen (20:34)
  • Re: MySQL Licence change article - eweek David Costa (19:44)
  • Re: PostgreSQL Performance Comparison Robert Bernier (17:48)
  • Re: PostgreSQL Performance Comparison Merlin Moncure (15:17)
  • Re: MySQL Licence change article - eweek Josh Berkus (00:15)
• 23 February 2004
  • Re: MySQL Licence change article - eweek Ian Barwick (23:55)
  • Wired article - mostly MySQL, but also namechecks us Richard Huxton (23:50)
  • MySQL Licence change article - eweek Richard Huxton (23:43)
  • Re: PostgreSQL Performance Comparison scott.marlowe (18:46)
  • Re: PostgreSQL Performance Comparison Robert Bernier (18:43)
  • Re: PostgreSQL Performance Comparison Merlin Moncure (14:29)
  • PostgreSQL Performance Comparison Robert Treat (13:27)
• 22 February 2004
  • Re: Question David Costa (01:32)
  • Re: News Feed: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy David Costa (01:29)
• 21 February 2004
  • Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement Josh Berkus (21:56)
  • Re: Question Joshua D. Drake (20:44)
  • Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement Joshua D. Drake (20:41)
  • Re: Question Joe Conway (19:28)
  • [Fwd: Re: Question] Rod Taylor (16:38)
  • Re: Question Rod Taylor (16:37)
  • Re: Question David Costa (16:16)
  • Re: Question Shridhar Daithankar (16:10)
  • Re: News Feed: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Magnus Hagander (16:06)
  • Re: Question Rod Taylor (16:00)
  • Re: Question Robert Treat (14:43)
  • Re: Question Chris Travers (12:15)
  • Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement Christopher Kings-Lynne (07:34)
  • Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement Joshua D. Drake (02:35)
  • Re: Question Joshua D. Drake (02:31)
  • Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement Rod Taylor (02:29)
  • Re: Question David Costa (02:01)
  • Re: Question David Costa (01:59)
  • Re: Question Josh Berkus (01:54)
  • Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement Josh Berkus (01:53)
  • Re: Question Robert Treat (01:14)
  • Re: Question David Costa (01:13)
  • Re: Question Joshua D. Drake (01:05)
  • Question David Costa (00:39)
  • Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement Christopher Browne (00:18)
• 20 February 2004
  • LinuxWorld Call for Papers - One Week Left (fwd) Bruce Momjian (20:41)
  • Re: plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement Josh Berkus (20:33)
  • Re: A dubious claim to fame ... Lamar Owen (17:04)
  • Re: A dubious claim to fame ... Robert Treat (14:09)
  • Re: A dubious claim to fame ... Bruce Momjian (03:43)
• 19 February 2004
  • Re: A dubious claim to fame ... Robert Treat (21:07)
  • Re: A dubious claim to fame ... Lamar Owen (17:53)
  • Re: A dubious claim to fame ... Joshua D. Drake (17:51)
  • Re: A dubious claim to fame ... Robert Treat (16:57)
  • Re: A dubious claim to fame ... scott.marlowe (16:44)
  • Re: A dubious claim to fame ... Robert Treat (16:41)
  • Re: A dubious claim to fame ... Josh Berkus (05:03)
  • Re: A dubious claim to fame ... Larry Rosenman (02:27)
  • Re: A dubious claim to fame ... Bruce Momjian (02:14)
  • A dubious claim to fame ... Josh Berkus (00:27)
• 17 February 2004
  • plug-n-play MS SQL Server replacement Lane Beneke (19:11)
  • Re: We beat MySQL in that Poll scott.marlowe (16:26)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Marc G. Fournier (15:15)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Bruce Momjian (15:09)
  • Re: [pgsql-www] News Feed: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy David Costa (10:43)
  • Re: News Feed: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy David Costa (09:40)
  • Re: pg_hba.conf elein (00:59)
  • News Feed: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy David Costa (00:27)
  • Re: pg_hba.conf Dan Langille (00:13)
• 16 February 2004
  • pg_hba.conf elein (23:42)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Josh Berkus (21:44)
  • Re: Clustered Postgresql Joshua D. Drake (20:22)
  • Re: Clustered Postgresql Rod Taylor (20:11)
  • Re: Clustered Postgresql Merlin Moncure (20:02)
• 15 February 2004
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Alexey Borzov (07:28)
• 14 February 2004
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Dan Langille (22:59)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy David Costa (21:31)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Joshua D. Drake (21:28)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Joshua D. Drake (21:27)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Alexey Borzov (21:14)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Marc G. Fournier (20:35)
  • Micromuse uses PostgreSQL Robert Bernier (20:18)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Joshua D. Drake (20:14)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Marc G. Fournier (20:07)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Joshua D. Drake (18:29)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Marc G. Fournier (18:06)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Joshua D. Drake (17:53)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Alexey Borzov (17:32)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Robert Treat (17:16)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Dan Langille (16:37)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy David Costa (15:47)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Joshua Drake (15:38)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Dan Langille (13:38)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Alexey Borzov (08:47)
  • We beat MySQL in that Poll Joshua D. Drake (03:14)
• 13 February 2004
  • Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres [auf Josh Berkus (23:10)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Marc G. Fournier (23:07)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy David Costa (22:53)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Marc G. Fournier (21:56)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy David Costa (21:15)
  • Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres [auf Marc G. Fournier (20:38)
  • Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres [auf Rod Taylor (19:27)
  • Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres [auf Joshua D. Drake (19:16)
  • Re: Fwd: [PHP] PHP/PostGreSQL Articles Joshua D. Drake (18:38)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Marc G. Fournier (13:14)
  • Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres [auf Viren Paul Smith (12:44)
  • PostgreSQLFr.org launch / Lancement de PostgreSQLFr.org Jean-Paul ARGUDO (12:41)
  • Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres [auf Claudio Natoli (11:53)
  • Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres [auf Viren Paul Smith (11:29)
  • Re: PHP/Postgresql Advocacy Josh Berkus (06:12)
  • Fwd: [PHP] PHP/PostGreSQL Articles Robert Treat (05:46)
  • Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres Adam Ruth (00:05)
• 12 February 2004
  • Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres Alex Satrapa (23:14)
  • PHP/Postgresql Advocacy David Costa (22:37)
  • Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres Andrew Dunstan (21:17)
  • Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres Magnus Hagander (21:02)
  • Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres Ned Lilly (20:56)
  • Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres Josh Berkus (19:30)
  • Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres Robert Treat (19:17)
  • Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres Peter Eisentraut (19:03)
  • Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres Bruce Momjian (18:55)
  • Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres Marc G. Fournier (18:38)
  • Re: Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres Hans-Jürgen Schönig (18:36)
• 11 February 2004
  • Anyone used GForge? Josh Berkus (17:30)
  • Rant to the guiding lights of Postgres Paul Smith (13:58)
• 10 February 2004
  • Re: I want to use postresql for this app, but... Chris Browne (21:16)
  • Re: [GENERAL] I want to use postresql for this app, but... Josh Berkus (20:47)
  • Re: [GENERAL] I want to use postresql for this app, but... Andrew Sullivan (16:01)
  • [Fwd: [HACKERS] MS SQL features for new version] Robert Treat (14:09)
  • Re: firebird getting some press Josh Berkus (06:49)
  • Re: firebird getting some press Greg Sabino Mullane (04:07)
• 09 February 2004
  • Re: First rule of advocacy ... I think ... Marc G. Fournier (19:26)
  • Re: First rule of advocacy ... I think ... scott.marlowe (19:23)
  • Re: First rule of advocacy ... I think ... Marc G. Fournier (18:16)
  • Re: BSDCan 2004 Dan Langille (18:12)
  • Re: First rule of advocacy ... I think ... Joshua Drake (17:55)
  • Re: BSDCan 2004 Jan Wieck (17:54)
  • Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Merlin Moncure (13:12)
  • Re: First rule of advocacy ... I think ... Josh Berkus (05:31)
  • First rule of advocacy ... I think ... Marc G. Fournier (05:04)
  • Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Marc G. Fournier (04:56)
• 08 February 2004
  • Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Christopher Browne (20:45)
  • Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Joshua Drake (20:15)
  • Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Joshua Drake (20:14)
  • Re: Updated Status (1/23/04) OSCON plans Jan Wieck (20:12)
  • Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Rod Taylor (20:05)
  • Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Neil Conway (19:57)
  • Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Josh Berkus (19:52)
  • Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Marc G. Fournier (19:45)
  • Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA elein (19:38)
  • Re: Updated Status (1/23/04) OSCON plans Josh Berkus (19:25)
  • Re: Fwd: Favorite DB poll on ORA Josh Berkus (19:24)

• Thread Index
• [Prev Page]
• [Next Page]