Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: SAPDB was DRAFT: v7.3 Release Announcement
- From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
- To: "Derek Barrett" <derekbarrett(at)graffiti(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: SAPDB was DRAFT: v7.3 Release Announcement
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:30:17 -0700
- Message-id: <200210281530.17174.josh@agliodbs.com> <text/plain>
Derek, > Well, I do agree with Postgres being older and more > established, but as far as name recognition goes, > I would put SAP as being ahead in that category > by a wide margin. SAP is well-known; SAP DB is not. I try to mention it whenever I list off OS databases (along with Phoenix) because nobody seems to have heard of it, and it's a natural for Oracle migrators. > Their free db also has built in replication. Yeah. I wish we could use their implementation, but the back-end architectures are radically different. -- -Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
- References:
- Re: SAPDB was DRAFT: v7.3 Release Announcement
- From: Derek Barrett
- Re: SAPDB was DRAFT: v7.3 Release Announcement
- Prev by Date: Re: SAPDB was DRAFT: v7.3 Release Announcement
- Next by Date: Re: SAPDB was DRAFT: v7.3 Release Announcement
- Previous by thread: Re: SAPDB was DRAFT: v7.3 Release Announcement
- Next by thread: Re: SAPDB was DRAFT: v7.3 Release Announcement
- Indexes: