Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: why use -Ft or -Fc instead of the other on pg_dump?
- From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
- To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: why use -Ft or -Fc instead of the other on pg_dump?
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 14:47:40 -0500
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 12:59:55PM -0500, Douglas J Hunley wrote: > I seemed to have walked into a "spirited" debate at work today, so I'm turning > to the authorities to get it resolved. Why would one choose -Ft over -Fc (or > vice-versa) when doing pg_dump? Is there truly any difference of note > (outside the formats themselves)? My rule is "never use -Ft". I've tripped over various bugs over the years. Indeed, I just had another example of one (from 7.4, mind) the other day. A
- References:
- why use -Ft or -Fc instead of the other on pg_dump?
- From: Douglas J Hunley
- why use -Ft or -Fc instead of the other on pg_dump?
- Prev by Date: Re: why use -Ft or -Fc instead of the other on pg_dump?
- Next by Date: Re: Database Loading
- Previous by thread: Re: why use -Ft or -Fc instead of the other on pg_dump?
- Next by thread: Database Loading
- Indexes: