Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
why use -Ft or -Fc instead of the other on pg_dump?
- From: Douglas J Hunley <doug(at)hunley(dot)homeip(dot)net>
- To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: why use -Ft or -Fc instead of the other on pg_dump?
- Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:59:55 -0500
I seemed to have walked into a "spirited" debate at work today, so I'm turning to the authorities to get it resolved. Why would one choose -Ft over -Fc (or vice-versa) when doing pg_dump? Is there truly any difference of note (outside the formats themselves)? Thanks -- Douglas J Hunley (doug at hunley.homeip.net) - Linux User #174778 http://doug.hunley.homeip.net The professor spit too much when he talked. It was like being at Sea World. "The first five rows will get wet."
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: why use -Ft or -Fc instead of the other on pg_dump?
- From: Andrew Sullivan
- Re: why use -Ft or -Fc instead of the other on pg_dump?
- From: Tom Lane
- Re: why use -Ft or -Fc instead of the other on pg_dump?
- Prev by Date: Re: Failover of the Primary database and starting the standby database in Postgresql in PITR configuraiton?
- Next by Date: Re: why use -Ft or -Fc instead of the other on pg_dump?
- Previous by thread: Log details are displaying on the console
- Next by thread: Re: why use -Ft or -Fc instead of the other on pg_dump?
- Indexes: