Re: PostgreSQL Europe statutes : recap

["Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 21 Jan 2008 17:13:29 +0100
Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:


> As I mentioned before - maybe we can simply reduce company influence  
> to an absolute minimum.
> I am also part of a PostgreSQL consulting company and I truly
> believe that our strongest argument for PostgreSQL is that PostgreSQL
> is not controlled by one single company.
> This gives customers a good choice and it gives security.
> 
> 	best regards,
> 
> 		hans

I thought I would provide a reference:

http://people.planetpostgresql.org/greg/index.php?/archives/120-Postgres-is-not-for-sale.html

*If* companies are members, members can effective "buy" PostgreSQL by
exerting influence over the various non profits and thus the resources
that PostgreSQL has. This is type of situation I am suggesting is not a
good one to get into.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

- -- 
The PostgreSQL Company: Since 1997, http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564   24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
SELECT 'Training', 'Consulting' FROM vendor WHERE name = 'CMD'


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHlMa/ATb/zqfZUUQRAu+MAJ9K1c/0eA46gLmCBSVXxfhI6spBpQCgqmWN
pdXfIuE2mP121id2+lO9Qn8=
=+tCm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----