Re: PostgreSQL Europe statutes : recap

["Gabriele Bartolini" <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)gmail(dot)com>]

Ciao,

> 1- Membership fee ?
>       a : Keep the statutes as they are
>       b : No membership fee for people
>       c : Optional membership fee for people

Does this need to be in the statues at all? If we can keep it out of the
statues, that'll make it a lot easier to change it if need be.

Not the fee. That'd be a nightmare. But I guess we have to write in the statute that there is a membership fee that needs to be paid.

> 2- Membership ?
>      a : Keep the statutes as they are
>      b : Automatic membership for users of local groups
>      c : Optional membership for users of local groups

This I think needs to be in the statues.

Yep. I am for option B where applicable.

> 5- Companies : sponsors or members ?
>     a : Keep the statutes as they are
>     b : Companies are sponsors

If #1 can be kept outside the statues, so can this one.

I believe this cannot be left out. I am for 'b'. Companies are not members. Only individuals are members.

The way I see it, getting the stuff that needs to be in the statues done
quickly is the most important part. The less we can "lock up" in the
statues, the easier it will be for us to adapt to what the member wants
over time.

I agree. But some stuff needs to be clear and solid since the beginning. Thanks guys.

Ciao,
Gabriele