Re: Euro PG conference?
- From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
- To: "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
- Cc: Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)gmail(dot)com>, Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(at)dalibo(dot)com>, pgeu-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Jean-Christophe Arnu <jcarnu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum <andreas(at)scherbaum(dot)la>
- Subject: Re: Euro PG conference?
- Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 19:51:09 +0200
- Message-id: <470D110D(dot)4070008(at)hagander(dot)net>
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> A city, without a working group and a real project, must not even
>> be mentioned. I believe that candidate cities come up with a proposal
>> and then we work it out. Proposing cities as we are doing now will
>> take us nowhere.
>
> This is correct. We certainly need to make sure we have boots on the
> ground, which is why I brought up France. As I see it from a boots on
> the ground perspective these are our options:
>
> France
> Italy
> Germany
> Britain
>
> Of these four, Italy and France see to be the most useful. (Honestly,
> Britian doesn't do much for me, I already speak english ;)).
Britain was already "disqualified" because they're not euro-zone.
//Magnus
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index