Re: Feature request: pgdump and version number / -i option
- From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
- To: "Sufficool, Stanley" <ssufficool(at)rov(dot)sbcounty(dot)gov>
- Cc: "pgAdmin III support" <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Feature request: pgdump and version number / -i option
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:59:06 +0000
- Message-id: <937d27e10901120059l284d092at9d619d98093ab4b5@mail.gmail.com> <text/plain>
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Sufficool, Stanley
<ssufficool(at)rov(dot)sbcounty(dot)gov> wrote:
>
> Can we get the database to handle this instead / also?
>
> If pg_dump / pg_restore were libs, could this be called via pl/pgsql
> functions instead?
If it were done in the right way, yes. The topic comes up on
pgsql-hackers every now and again, but I'm not aware that anyone has
worked on it.
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index