Re: Why are binary snapshots older than binary production release versions?
- From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
- To: "Florian G. Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
- Cc: "Obe, Regina" <robe(dot)dnd(at)cityofboston(dot)gov>, pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Why are binary snapshots older than binary production release versions?
- Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2008 08:56:49 +0100
- Message-id: <937d27e10809080056p78026e82y30b414a63ab9c18d@mail.gmail.com> <text/plain>
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:35 AM, Florian G. Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> The OSX build was an automate build run by Florian - I don't know what
>> happened to that. I can probably run it on a box in my office if
>> Florian's is permanently offline.
>
> The harddrive in the old G3 crashed and burned (probably literally speaking,
> judging from the sounds it produced ;-) ). So far, I haven't been able to
> get a replacement drive that works in that machine - for some reason, it
> refuses to talk to drives that are too new :-(
OK, no worries. Having spent the weekend arguing with the harddrive in
my Sky+ box, I know where you're coming from!
--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index