Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Why are binary snapshots older than binary production release versions?
- From: "Florian G. Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
- To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
- Cc: "Obe, Regina" <robe(dot)dnd(at)cityofboston(dot)gov>, pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: Why are binary snapshots older than binary production release versions?
- Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:35:44 +0100
- Message-id: <48C46550.7050801@phlo.org> <text/plain>
Dave Page wrote:
The OSX build was an automate build run by Florian - I don't know what happened to that. I can probably run it on a box in my office if Florian's is permanently offline.
The harddrive in the old G3 crashed and burned (probably literally speaking, judging from the sounds it produced ;-) ). So far, I haven't been able to get a replacement drive that works in that machine - for some reason, it refuses to talk to drives that are too new :-(
regards, Florian Pflug
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Why are binary snapshots older than binary production release versions?
- Next by Date: Re: Why are binary snapshots older than binary production release versions?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why are binary snapshots older than binary production release versions?
- Next by thread: Re: Why are binary snapshots older than binary production release versions?
- Indexes: