On May 22, 3:06 pm, laurent_ro(dot)(dot)(dot)(at)yahoo(dot)com (Laurent ROCHE) wrote: (...) > To me I don't see, the point of having the full Server ServNm (servnm:5432): ServNm is enough. You raised a couple of interesting points. Just a quick comment here: the port number is essential if you have several database clusters running on different ports on the same server (as I do). Regards Erwin