Re: [Q] (S)RPM for 1.6.1

[Devrim GUNDUZ <devrim(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com>]

Hi Dave,

On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 08:34 +0000, Dave Page wrote:
> So why not statically link it?
> 
> The code has worked just fine for months - there's no technical reason
> why RPMs cannot be built. 

Stable wxWidgets was just released -- this is the technical reason that
we don't have 1.6.X RPMS. As we talked before, pgAdmin 1.6 is built on a
non-stable version of wx until wx 2.8.0 was released. 

Apart from that, people will want to build pgadmin from SRPM. In that
case, they will still need binary packages for wxWidgets.

Basically: I don't want to release 1.6.X RPMs that are built against
non-rpm version of wx.

But I can say that 2.8.0 RPM is near --so pgadmin RPM is. I'm following
the FC extras lists closely for that...

Regards,
-- 
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part