Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: License question
- From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
- To: "Mickael Deloison" <mdeloison(at)gmail(dot)com>
- Cc: "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
- Subject: Re: License question
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 09:59:29 +0100
- Message-id: <937d27e10804250159w7755d8cfvb8a2896862331c94(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Mickael Deloison <mdeloison(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote: > The Artistic License only seems fine and simple, so I am going to go for it. > About psql integration, I have never thought about it. But pgScript is > written in C++ (with objects and RTTI) and I think if its features > were integrated into psql, it would be done in a different way, so > this is not an issue right now. OK, cool - Artistic only is most certainly the cleanest and most agreeable approach imho. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
- References:
- License question
- From: Mickael Deloison
- Re: License question
- From: Dave Page
- Re: License question
- From: Magnus Hagander
- Re: License question
- From: Dave Page
- Re: License question
- From: Mickael Deloison
- License question
- Prev by Date: Re: Broken 1.8.2 source tar ball?
- Next by Date: Re: Broken 1.8.2 source tar ball?
- Previous by thread: Re: License question
- Next by thread: Broken 1.8.2 source tar ball?
- Indexes: