Skip site navigation (1)
Skip section navigation (2)
Peripheral Links
Header And Logo
|
Site Navigation
Re: Slony schemas
- From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
- To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Cc: pgadmin-hackers <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Slony schemas
- Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 22:08:11 +0100
- Message-id: <478BCF3B.7030900@hagander.net> <text/plain>
Dave Page wrote:
On 14/01/2008, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:Magnus Hagander wrote:I would like to move slony schemas under the Catalogs node instead of the Schema node, since you're not meant to store "normal stuff" under there. Any objections to this?Actually, let me rephrase that. Any objections *or approvals* of that? ;-)Sounds sensible to me. They should probably have a sensible artificial name (like the catalogs do) so it's obvious what they are.
Right now I have (for schema _cluster1): "Slony catalog (cluster1)". Seems sensible enough?
//Magnus
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Slony schemas
- From: Dave Page
- Re: Slony schemas
- References:
- Slony schemas
- From: Magnus Hagander
- Re: Slony schemas
- From: Magnus Hagander
- Re: Slony schemas
- From: Dave Page
- Slony schemas
- Prev by Date: Re: Slony schemas
- Next by Date: Re: Slony schemas
- Previous by thread: Re: Slony schemas
- Next by thread: Re: Slony schemas
- Indexes: