Re: CHANGELOG
- From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
- To: <pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>, <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
- Cc: <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: CHANGELOG
- Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 13:54:41 +0100
- Message-id: <008801c66d1e$72d44ebb$6a01a8c0(at)valehousing(dot)co(dot)uk>
-----Original Message-----
From: "Andreas Pflug"<pgadmin(at)pse-consulting(dot)de>
Sent: 01/05/06 11:41:59
To: "Dave Page"<dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org"<pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CHANGELOG
> Um, until 1.4 we didn't fill the version number until we really had a
> release. Since features may move in and out, some might be marked as
> relased that never will.
And they still need removing. This way I have less work at release time, and the notes changes less over time.
/D
-----Unmodified Original Message-----
Dave Page wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I added the version number back into all the changelog entires that you
> removed them from. We know what the version number will be so it makes
> no sense not to include it now and save me 10 minutes of post-release
> editting later on.
>
Um, until 1.4 we didn't fill the version number until we really had a
release. Since features may move in and out, some might be marked as
relased that never will.
Regards,
Andreas
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index