Re: Buildproblems on OSX 10.3 due to libxml2
- From: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
- To: <openmacnews(at)gmail(dot)com>
- Cc: <pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
- Subject: Re: Buildproblems on OSX 10.3 due to libxml2
- Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:37:32 -0000
- Message-id: <E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E40103E464(at)ratbert(dot)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: OpenMacNews [mailto:openmacnews(at)gmail(dot)com]
> Sent: 27 February 2006 16:27
> To: Dave Page
> Cc: pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
> Subject: Re: [pgadmin-hackers] Buildproblems on OSX 10.3 due
> to libxml2
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
> > Why's it even being called? We don't create any libraries
> at all (and I
> > never saw any warnings about it on Tiger, or back when I was running
> > Panther).
>
> well, glibtoolize is being called cuz i'm calling it ... as i
> typically
> do given that i've a rather up-to-date env. just cleaning
> house, as it
> were.
>
> as for why glibtoolize is 'calling' AC_PROG_LIBTOOL, that's
> to be found
> in libtool.m4:
OK, you'll have to excuse my bumbling ignorance when it comes to all
things automake/autoconf - why are you running glibtoolize in the
pgAdmin source directory? The bootstrap script does everything that's
required from a clean SVN checkout, and is also sufficient to rebuild
things if you change anything.
Regards, Dave
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index