Re: Extensions, this time with a patch

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extensions, this time with a patch
Date: 2010-11-22 21:12:39
Message-ID: m2r5edhxko.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> No. My suggestion was just to use the internal parser.

What about something like the attached, cfparser.v3.patch?

If that looks ok, do we want to add some documentation about the new
lexer capabilities? Also, for what good reason would we want to prevent
people from using the include facility?

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

Attachment Content-Type Size
cfparser.v3.patch text/x-patch 15.1 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Tanski 2010-11-22 21:18:36 GiST seems to drop left-branch leaf tuples
Previous Message Joachim Wieland 2010-11-22 20:49:09 Re: Hot Standby: too many KnownAssignedXids