Re: Inline Extension

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inline Extension
Date: 2012-01-20 19:02:55
Message-ID: m2k44m9oyo.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Maybe you would want the system to be able to determine the oldest
>> version to start from to reach the current default_version given in the
>> control file, but I guess it would be better to add another property
>> like default_full_version or such (last_stop?).
>
> Possibly that might be a better design, yes. Especially since we
> don't order version numbers intrinsically.

It's quite simple to implement too, see attached. As for the version
number ordering, that's a giant rat hole I don't want to be digging in,
and I think we can bypass that problem entirely.

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

Attachment Content-Type Size
extension-default-full-version.v0.patch text/x-patch 17.7 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-01-20 19:21:16 Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-01-20 18:58:52 Re: Vacuum rate limit in KBps