Re: SP-GiST for ranges based on 2d-mapping and quad-tree

From: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Subject: Re: SP-GiST for ranges based on 2d-mapping and quad-tree
Date: 2013-03-04 05:16:06
Message-ID: CAPpHfduoui6J56ah7aUQifk+f_-YVPPOAfBXSJ8L-xaRYZozGQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> On 03/04/2013 01:42 AM, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> >
> > This patch only adds one more operator to already committed new
> > opclass. Tests already cover this case. Without patch corresponding
> > test leads to sequential scan instead of index scan. However, I can't
> > see any documentation changes about already committed opclass. I think
> > we need a documentation update as an separate patch.
> > Jeff changes only does comments changes and renaming, I don't need to
> > examine them more.
>
> OK. Would it be fair to summarize that as "I think it's ready to commit
> as-is" ? Do you have any outstanding concerns or uncertainties?

Yes. I think it's ready to commit as-is.

------
With best regards,
Alexander Korotkov.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2013-03-04 05:18:12 Re: Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-03-04 05:14:54 Re: [HACKERS] Floating point error