Re: [BUGS] surprising to_timestamp behavior

From: Jeevan Chalke <jeevan(dot)chalke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres-Bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [BUGS] surprising to_timestamp behavior
Date: 2014-01-20 06:23:58
Message-ID: CAM2+6=WGtL-_X0j9QJnYrHUWPxAzROzh_7HX3y1obKi7BXefDg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers

>
> I went to review this, and found that there's not actually a patch
> attached ...
>
> regards, tom lane
>

Attached. Sorry for that.

--
Jeevan B Chalke
Principal Software Engineer, Product Development
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment Content-Type Size
fix_surprising_to_timestamp_behavior.patch text/x-diff 4.0 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message anjali_524 2014-01-20 09:22:09 BUG #8891: Duplicate Primary Key
Previous Message Elein 2014-01-20 00:21:42 Re: BUG #7730: intarray representation of empty arrays

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Khandekar 2014-01-20 07:11:07 Re: Proposal: variant of regclass
Previous Message Craig Ringer 2014-01-20 06:15:13 Re: [v9.4] row level security