Re: Selectivity estimation for inet operators

From: "Brightwell, Adam" <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>
To: Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dilip kumar <dilip(dot)kumar(at)huawei(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Selectivity estimation for inet operators
Date: 2014-09-16 17:14:16
Message-ID: CAKRt6CQZ34oJXJ1FXktijX4vdg_75R=sr1gQ8-3zqaDtvKKz6Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> New version with semi join estimation function attached.
>

I have performed the following initial review:

- Patch format. -- submitted as unified, but not sure it makes it any
easier to read than context format.
- Apply to current master (77e65bf). -- success (though, I do get
"Stripping trailing CR's from patch;" notification)
- check-world -- success
- Whitespace - were the whitespace changes in pg_operator.h necessary?

As for implementation, I'll leave that to those with a better understanding
of the purpose/expectations of the modified functions.

-Adam

--
Adam Brightwell - adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com
Database Engineer - www.crunchydatasolutions.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tapan Halani 2014-09-16 17:51:43 Help to startup
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2014-09-16 17:14:08 Re: jsonb contains behaviour weirdness