| From: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Asif Naeem <anaeem(dot)it(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [BUGS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max |
| Date: | 2014-08-12 10:12:57 |
| Message-ID: | CAJrrPGf+ekceZWh6xGVd0M-8xE+hSe17ynOO+Y9BuBZ77iaJUw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Asif Naeem <anaeem(dot)it(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Sorry for not being clear, above mentioned test is related to following doc (sgml) changes that seems not working as described i.e.
>
> Table 9-35. cidr and inet Functions
>
> FunctionReturn TypeDescriptionExampleResult
>
> max(inet, inet) inetlarger of two inet typesmax('192.168.1.5', '192.168.1.4')192.168.1.5
> min(inet, inet) inetsmaller of two inet typesmin('192.168.1.5', '192.168.1.4')192.168.1.4
>
> Can you please elaborate these sgml change ?
I thought of adding them for newly added "network" functions but
mistakenly I kept the names as max and min.
Anyway with your suggestion in the earlier mail, these changes are not required.
I removed these changes in the attached patch.
Thanks for reviewing the patch.
Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| inet_agg_v7.patch | application/octet-stream | 7.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2014-08-12 20:42:23 | Re: BUG #11141: Duplicate primary key values corruption |
| Previous Message | Jean LETUTOUR | 2014-08-12 07:59:37 | postgresql on freescale i.MX 28 ( armv5) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2014-08-12 10:13:24 | Re: pg_receivexlog --status-interval add fsync feedback |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-08-12 09:44:22 | Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5) |