From: | Rodolfo Campero <rodolfo(dot)campero(at)anachronics(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PL/Python: domain over array support |
Date: | 2013-11-22 10:45:56 |
Message-ID: | CAHNrXgFgMvraWuZdUMwi47reN+W-WTx6NKKQpYQSfc2yMkCJ_A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Marko,
2013/11/22 Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 11:17:19AM -0200, Rodolfo Campero wrote:
> > The attached patch add support of domains over arrays to PL/Python (eg:
> > CREATE DOMAIN my_domain AS integer[]).
> >
> > Basically it just uses get_base_element_type instead of get_element_type
> > in plpy_typeio.c, and uses domain_check before returning a sequence as
> > array in PLySequence_ToArray whenever appropriate.
>
> Generally looks fine. Please lose the C++ comments though, this style
> is not used in Postgres sources.
>
Done.
> > There's one line I'm not sure about; I modified a switch statement (line
> > 427):
> > switch (element_type ? element_type : getBaseType(arg->typoid))
> > The rationale is that when element_type is set, it is already a base
> type,
> > because there is no support of arrays of domains in PostgreSQL, but this
> > may not held true in the future.
>
> Was there any actual need to modify that? Or was it just performance
> optimization? ATM it creates asymmetry between PLy_output_datum_func2
> and PLy_input_datum_func2.
>
> If it's just performace optimization, then it should be done in both
> functions, but seems bad idea to do it in this patch. So I think
> it's better to leave it out.
>
>
There was no actual need to modify that, so I dropped that change in this
new patch.
There are other cosmetic changes in this patch, wrt previous version (not
preexistent code):
* adjusted alignment of variable name "rv" in line 12
* reworded comment in line 850, resulting in more than 80 characters, so I
splitted the comment into a multiline comment following the surrounding
style.
Thanks for your review.
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
plpython_domain_over_array_v2.patch | text/x-patch | 4.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2013-11-22 11:11:22 | Re: [PERFORM] Cpu usage 100% on slave. s_lock problem. |
Previous Message | Rajeev rastogi | 2013-11-22 10:44:45 | Re: COPY table FROM STDIN doesn't show count tag |