| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Reporting WAL file containing checkpoint's REDO record in pg_controldata's result |
| Date: | 2012-06-26 15:06:35 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwH8XWJKCUn2ipmYDJ4zm37OLhhTGKhBw_=QGWCpMM5AGQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> Excerpts from Fujii Masao's message of mar mar 27 06:40:34 -0300 2012:
>>
>>> Anyway, should I add this patch into the next CF? Or is anyone planning
>>> to commit the patch for 9.2?
>>
>> I think the correct thing to do here is add to next CF, and if some
>> committer has enough interest in getting it quickly it can be grabbed
>> from there and committed into 9.2.
>
> Yep! I've added it to next CF.
Attached is the revised version of the patch.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| pg_controldata_walfilename_v4.patch | application/octet-stream | 1.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2012-06-26 15:23:14 | Re: libpq compression |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2012-06-26 14:06:08 | Re: [PATCH 01/16] Overhaul walsender wakeup handling |