From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY |
Date: | 2013-02-28 14:26:40 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwFyG=d+Y+KWWGb7qso9Zbc=2LQF8m0fC_VxNPz0kbJPQQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 3:21 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Andres, Masao, do you need an extra round or review or do you think this is
> ready to be marked as committer?
> On my side I have nothing more to add to the existing patches.
Sorry for the late reply.
I found one problem in the latest patch. I got the segmentation fault
when I executed the following SQLs.
CREATE TABLE hoge (i int);
CREATE INDEX hogeidx ON hoge(abs(i));
INSERT INTO hoge VALUES (generate_series(1,10));
REINDEX TABLE CONCURRENTLY hoge;
The error messages are:
LOG: server process (PID 33641) was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault
DETAIL: Failed process was running: REINDEX TABLE CONCURRENTLY hoge;
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-02-28 14:55:18 | Re: Materialized views WIP patch |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2013-02-28 12:50:05 | Re: pg_basebackup caused FailedAssertion |