Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER?

From: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Albe Laurenz <laurenz(dot)albe(at)wien(dot)gv(dot)at>, Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>
Subject: Re: poll: CHECK TRIGGER?
Date: 2012-03-12 09:47:26
Message-ID: CAFj8pRDzEs9PUTs5WuCbvJbOrg3D_efCF4dwJYXLKL6yXpY7Rw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2012/3/11 Petr Jelinek <pjmodos(at)pjmodos(dot)net>:
> On 03/10/2012 04:36 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>
>> and there some cleaned version
>>
>>
>
>
> Reran my tests and adjusted docs a bit, tbh I considered the previous
> versions way more useful but even in this form it's nice and useful
> functionality.
>

remove two lines of death code

Regards

Pavel

> Regards
> Petr Jelinek

Attachment Content-Type Size
plpgsql_check_function2-2012-03-12.diff.gz application/x-gzip 17.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2012-03-12 10:21:06 NOT NULL violation error handling in file_fdw
Previous Message Albe Laurenz 2012-03-12 09:08:10 Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server